One of the enduring questions in the minds of readers of the history of Saqifah and the events following the martyrdom of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is why Imam Ali (peace be upon him), despite being the rightful and divinely appointed leader after the Prophet, did not take action against the government […]
One of the enduring questions in the minds of readers of the history of Saqifah and the events following the martyrdom of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is why Imam Ali (peace be upon him), despite being the rightful and divinely appointed leader after the Prophet, did not take action against the government formed at Saqifah to reclaim his right to leadership. In simpler terms, why did Imam Ali (peace be upon him) remain silent?
Among Muslim historians and analysts, there are two main theories regarding the reason for Imam Ali’s silence:
Some historians, mainly from the Sunni tradition and a few others, argue that Imam Ali’s 25-year silence indicates that he did not consider the leadership as his divine right but rather believed that the right to govern belonged to the people. For example, Mehdi Bazargan, a prominent figure, suggests that the behavior of the Shiite Imams in relation to leadership shows that they did not see the right to rule as belonging to a tyrant like Yazid, themselves, or even God, but rather to the people.
Ibn Abi al-Hadid, a well-known Sunni scholar, in his famous commentary on Nahj al-Balagha, interprets Imam Ali’s reluctance to accept leadership after the assassination of Uthman as proof that he was not directly appointed by the Prophet to govern, otherwise, he would not have said, “Leave me and seek someone else.”
The majority of Shiite historians and some Sunni scholars support the second theory, which asserts that the leadership was indeed Imam Ali’s divine right, explicitly declared by the Prophet Muhammad. They cite various reasons for Imam Ali’s silence based on his own words and the sayings of the Prophet.
In summary, Imam Ali’s silence for 25 years, despite the injustices he faced, was a calculated decision aimed at preserving the unity and stability of the Islamic community.
He chose to endure the hardships and delay asserting his right to leadership to ensure that the efforts of the Prophet Muhammad in establishing the Islamic community would not go to waste.
Leave a Reply